Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2025, 10:51 am
To date the ERA hasn't yet been published as valid by the Archivist of the United States, whose statutory duty it would be; nor is the second Trump Administration likely to recognize it as valid. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 6:48 am
It is the policy of the United States to protect the civil rights of all Americans and to promote individual initiative, excellence, and hard work. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 4:30 am
And in her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 2:59 am
The order makes direct reference to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
During last month’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 8:24 pm
Third, the order simply withholds the issuance of certain identity documents: It is the policy of the United States that no department or agency of the United States government shall issue documents recognizing United States citizenship, or accept documents issued by State, local, or other governments or authorities purporting to recognize United States citizenship . . . . [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:23 pm
Bruen 597 U.S. 1 (2022) and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 5:49 am
”[5] Under NAGPRA, museums were required to repatriate applicable human remains and cultural items upon the request of a tribe, with the statute laying out a process for inventorying items and working with tribes.[6] At the time, the government estimated that it would take about a decade to complete this repatriation.[7] However, over three decades later, over 110,000 Native American remains were still unrepatriated as of 2023, with scholars estimating it to take anywhere from 70 to over 200… [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 1:25 pm
United States, the justices will decide a procedural question relating to appeals. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 9:15 am
Thirty-eight states have sought to ratify the ERA, the minimum number under Article V's three-fourths ratification requirement. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 1:49 pm
Perhaps it shows a state of mind exception, allowing admissibility. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 10:14 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments on Wednesday in Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision in Parker v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 7:15 am
” As the opinion quoted, it provided: that the forms of writs, executions and other process, except their style, and the forms and modes of proceeding in suits in those of common law, shall be the same as are now used in the said Courts respectively, in pursuance of the act entitled, “an act to regulate processes in the Courts of the United States,” except to far as may have been provided for by the act to establish the judicial Courts of the… [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:51 pm
As the President of theNational Bar Association (the oldest and largest bar association of AfricanAmerican and minority lawyers, judges, law students, and legal professionals inthe United States and worldwide), I was honored to moderate and participateJournal of Legal Education, Volume 73, Number 1 (Fall 2024) Panel Discussion:How to Become a Full-Time Law Professor – A Workshop for Aspirants113 in one of the most significant panels at the Fourth National… [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 6:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm
The court of appeals relied on the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in Ginsberg v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:05 am
I sat closer to the Justices this time than in the more highly-attended arguments for United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:37 am
NATO took over air defenses in Poland from the United States yesterday, the alliance’s spokesperson said, adding that the move is part of a broader effort to shift the responsibility for helping Ukraine to European countries. [read post]
