Search for: "United States v. Mitchell"
Results 21 - 40
of 998
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Justice Gorsuch was the most interested questioner on whether the President was an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
” Indeed, they reject any difference between an “Officer of the United States” and an “Office under the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
(And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
The argument that the violence at the Capitol on January 6, 2021 did not amount to an insurrection against the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
” The Houthis’ military spokesperson Yahya Sarea has issued a statement saying the United States and the United Kingdom carried out 18 strikes in Yemen in total, warning “these attacks will not go unanswered. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:22 pm
" … In United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 8:22 pm
–––– [139 S.Ct. 2525] (Mitchell), the United States Supreme Court held when a “driver is unconscious and therefore cannot be given a breath test … the exigent-circumstances rule almost always permits a blood test without a warrant. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:21 am
Casey and Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Finchett-Maddock & Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, To Open Up: A performative rewriting of Pendragon v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR CD 179 , (Helen Dancer, Bonnie Holligan and Helena Howe (eds.) [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:06 am
On Aug. 18, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in the long-running Marriott Data Breach MDL Litigation. [read post]
