Search for: "United States v. Mitchell" Results 81 - 100 of 739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2009, 6:03 am by Brian A. Comer
You can find his post here.In a nutshell, the decision seems to show a greater reliance on the punitive damages standards set forth in the United States Supreme Court decision of BMW of North America v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:59 pm by Kunal Patel
District Court entered default judgment in favor of the Government in an FBAR penalty suit in the case of United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation)Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 3:56 pm
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Mitchell of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of Kapton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:10 am by Milena Sterio
”  According to the complain, the territoriality requirement has been met in this case, because both defendants are American citizens and reside in the United States, because the defendants devised their torture plan in the United States, because they supervised and implemented the plan from the United States, and because the ill-treatment of the three detainees took place while they were held at United… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:20 am by Giovanna Shay
At oral argument in the Texas state prisoner’s federal habeas case Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what Kentucky statutes provide, and today the Kentucky Supreme Court applied this rule in Mitchell v. [read post]