Search for: "United States v. Moore" Results 1 - 20 of 1,119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Perhaps the only outlier, in recent memory, of a rapid unanimous decision was Dames & Moore v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 3:01 pm by Josh Blackman
The sweetest sentence came on the penultimate page: In determining that plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their Free Exercise claim, we also have no need to rely upon either South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
In determining that plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their Free Exercise claim, we also have no need to rely upon either South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]