Search for: "United States v. Morales" Results 81 - 100 of 3,568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm by Ryan E. Long
For example, in a recent decision from United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the court found that wholly created AI works cannot be copyrighted. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am by Scott Bomboy
United States (1992) Justice O’Connor wrote the 6-3 majority opinion in a case about the respective roles of the federal government and the states under the 10th Amendment. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
" Excerpt:The "free lunch" refers to the once-common tradition of saloons in the United States providing a "free" lunch to patrons who had purchased at least one drink. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm by Marci Hamilton
  She reasoned that banning males from a state nursing school was based on tired stereotypes, which set the stage for the later decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” Health care providers described feeling moral distress when they were unable to provide evidence- based care, and some reported considering moving their practices to a state where abortion remains legal…” [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 4:12 am by jonathanturley
The latest is a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit striking down key provisions of the law passed after the Bruen decision. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:16 pm by Michael Oykhman
However, common law, such as R v Ruzic and R v Ryan notes that the list of excluded offences under section 17 is unconstitutional as that risks convicting morally innocent individuals. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
As the world’s first binding treaty to explicitly protect environmental defenders, the Escazu Agreement was a turning point – although, notably, the United States and many other countries are not signatories. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
”[18] Meanwhile, critics argue against ethics-driven restitution as having “weak connections to modern states’ culture or having merely political or moral sentiment without a legal basis. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am by Joel R. Brandes
In short, the Amber Alert was no evidence that A.B.M. was (or remains) outside of Mexico, let alone that she was (or remains) in the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan asserted, “where a person has taken a solemn oath to support the Constitution of the United States there is a fair moral implication that he cannot afterward commit an act which in its effect would destroy the Constitution of the United States without incurring the guilt of at least moral perjury. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[19]The Interpretive Guidance states that the Council expects to “continue addressing most risks through its collaboration with primary financial regulators” and will base any nonbank financial company designation on “data-driven analysis that reflects the distinctive aspects of the company, its market, and its existing regulation. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:48 am by Samuel Bray
Proper Parties, Proper Relief tackles all these questions, and along the way it also discusses other major cases from the October 2022 Term, including United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 38. [read post]