Search for: "United States v. Morris" Results 21 - 40 of 916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2009, 8:20 am
United States, a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit the couple filed three years ago in the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:00 pm by Tamara Piety
Philip Morris USA, Inc., et.al., See DCCA opinion    This was a civil RICO case filed by the United States in 1999 against several tobacco companies and two of their non-profit organizations, the Council for Tobacco Research and the Tobacco Institute. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:57 pm
The cost to Philip Morris of trying to slant jury instructions too far in its favor -- $79.5 million in punitive damages: As I first noted in this post from this morning, today the Supreme Court of Oregon issued its ruling, on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, in Williams v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 6:30 am
SEBOK Findlaw Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2007 Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:26 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, March 31, 2023, Philip Morris v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 5:40 am by Patricia Salkin
In response, the Defendants claimed that the State Laws were preempted by federal law, namely, the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”). [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:05 am by Patrick Daniel Law
Product liability cases are rarely as spectacular as the McDonald’s case, or the $28 billion case of United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 3:17 am
Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:08 am by Lisa Perrochet
William Hines was intrigued by the creative approach that the Oregon Supreme Court followed in 2008 when reaffirming a 97-to-1 punitive award against Philip Morris after the United States Supreme Court decision in Philip Morris v. [read post]