Search for: "United States v. Morrison" Results 1 - 20 of 919
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 7:40 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Caren Myers Morrison (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posted The Drug Dealer, the Narc, and the Very Tiny Constable: Reflections on United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:24 am by Lawrence Solum
Kermit Roosevelt III (University of Pennsylvania Law School) has posted Bait and Switch: Why United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:35 am by Kate Fort
The second is Morrison’s claim that the CCTA was inapplicable to him given New York’s “forbearance policy,” under which the State refrained from collecting taxes on cigarette sales transacted on Native American reservations. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:11 am
Morrison, Columbia Law School, has posted The Story of United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:11 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) At least as of this evening, with a search from the Washington, DC area (a necessary caveat):united states v. lopez united states v. carroll towing co. united states v. morrison united states v. jones united states v. comstock united states v. virginia united states v. booker united… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by Paul Karlsgodt
The decision explores the contours of the US Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:22 am by Jennifer Liu
She noted at the outset that plaintiffs did not even make the argument that irrevocable liability occurred in the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:02 am by John Bellinger, Andy Wang
‘took place outside the United States,’ we did not need to determine, as we did in Morrison, the statute’s ‘focus. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The transactions at issue in this case were not subject to Rule 105 because while the short sales took place on the NYSE, the activities related to the subsequent purchase of the same securities in an offering occurred entirely outside of the United States (SEC v. [read post]
” Second, is the mere placement of a buy order in the United States for the purchase of foreign securities on a foreign exchange sufficient to allege that a purchaser incurred irrevocable liability in the United States, such that the U.S. securities laws govern the purchase of those securities under the Second Circuit’s decision in Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
Here is Angelo’s guest post::     On June 10, 2011, Judge Barbara Jones of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in a case entitled SEC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
Here is Angelo’s guest post::     On June 10, 2011, Judge Barbara Jones of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in a case entitled SEC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
In The Myth of Morrison: Securities Fraud Litigation Against Foreign Issuers, we examine the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]