Search for: "United States v. Mound" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 9:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Corps of Engineers: Opening Brief Federal Answer Brief Reply Lower court materials here. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
A mound-building Native American culture once flourished before the arrival of Europeans in what is now the southeastern United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
A mound-building Native American culture once flourished before the arrival of Europeans in what is now the southeastern United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 2:19 pm by Unknown
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Cultural Resources)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlDuke S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:17 am by Kent Scheidegger
Judge Aldisert of USCA3 lets appellate defense counsel have it with both barrels in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§ 465, state and local governments cannot tax permanent improvements built on non-reservation land owned by the United States and held in trust for an Indian Tribe, stating that:   Under Mescalero, § 465’s exemption from state and local taxation applies to the permanent improvements on that land. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§ 465, state and local governments cannot tax permanent improvements built on non-reservation land owned by the United States and held in trust for an Indian Tribe, stating that:   Under Mescalero, § 465’s exemption from state and local taxation applies to the permanent improvements on that land. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:33 pm by azatty
In fact, they got to go to the big show—as a defendant at the United States Supreme Court (Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:59 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The opinion in this case was issued on May 16, 2011, by the United States District Court, S. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 10:37 am by Albert Gidari
United States, the Supreme Court will decide whether a warrant is required for the government to obtain a cell phone customer’s location history. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am by MBettman
United States, 235 P.3d 42 (Cal. 2010) (The statutory phrase “keep the premises safe” is an apt description of the property-based duties underlying premises liability, a liability category that does not include vehicular negligence.) [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:50 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Which in our humble opinion has a good shot of a grant, since the Ninth Circuit's opinion directly conflicts with both Ehrlich and the Texas Supreme Court's opinion in City of Flower Mound v. [read post]