Search for: "United States v. Muniz"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 8:58 am
(See Swarthout v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:05 am
United States, 526 U.S. 314, 326 (1999). [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm
United States, 575 F.2d 515, 521 (5th Cir.1978) (poor health); Dows v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
— Muniz v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm
United States, 724 F.2d 831, 834 (9th Cir. 1984); see also Burdine v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Of course, for federal private-prison inmates, suits against the United States directly are out. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The case is Villalpando v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 8:18 am
Muniz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm
From Fried v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Spoons, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:32 am
United States: two second-degree murder convictions overturned after three days of police questioning in the absence of counsel. 1944 Ashcroft v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Eliminating this term from the Family Court Act is intended to send a positive message and assist in the efforts to achieve full equality and empowerment for girls, young women, and people of color.Determination to calculate income by applying reasonable rate of return to entire tort settlement award not an improvident exercise of discretion In Matter of Gerghty v Muniz, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1287197 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 26, 2008 Muniz v. [read post]
