Search for: "United States v. Murphy" Results 21 - 40 of 1,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 7:29 am by Silver Law Group
UBS Securities LLC et al., case number 22-660, before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:32 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Murphy, In Memoriam Thomas Buergenthal (1934–2023) International DecisionsJavier Garcia Olmedo, Zaza Okuashvili v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Although Willis, acting for Fulton County and the state of Georgia, has no power to grant Powell or Chesebro any kind of immunity against federal prosecution, pursuant to the SCOTUS decisions in Murphy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Textualism fight at the Eleventh Circuit, where the whole damn banc is divided on whether "any officer or employee of the United States" includes former officers and employees. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck has been assisting with research and strategic planning in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency announced a final rule that revised the definition of “waters of the United States,” limiting the agency’s authority to address water pollution. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency announced a final rule that revised the definition of “waters of the United States,” limiting the agency’s authority to address water pollution. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
They want access to our markets without being held responsible for the damage they are causing to consumers here in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 4:35 pm by Andrea Schneider
Murphy said he thought Ambassador Tai was “too nice” to be a good negotiator for the United States. [read post]