Search for: "United States v. Muslim"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm
Publications:The Application of the “One Central Reason” Standard in Asylum and Withholding of Removal Cases (Congressional Research Service, Dec. 2017) [text]Border Patrol Termination Rates: Discipline and Performance Problems Signal Need for Reform, Policy Analysis, no. 825 (Cato Institute, Nov. 2017) [text]"Middle Eastern and North African Immigrants in the United States," Migration Information Source, 10 Jan. 2018 [text]"MS-13 as a Terrorist… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:10 am
The Justice Department yesterday announced that it had filed a Notice of Dismissal in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
It was, in other words, no coincidence that the president who promised to ban Muslims from entering the United States signed an order that would ban a large number of Muslims from entering the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
It will separate Muslims in the United States from their family members abroad. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:35 am
Khaled Rikabi alleged that the Center's chief of staff openly referred to Muslims as a threat to the United States after 9-11. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 11:11 pm
Chertoff, (SDNY, Dec. 20, 2007), a New York federal district court upheld the U.S. government's denial of a visa to Tariq Ramadan, a prominent Muslim scholar who had originally been offered a tenured position at the University of Notre Dame, and who later wished to attend other academic events in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:30 am
He said we have a problem with Muslims in the United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:45 am
Trump called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,” claiming that “there is great hatred towards Americans by large segments of the Muslim population. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:45 am
While a handful of courts around the United States have found unconstitutional President Trump’s travel ban on Muslim-majority nations, these courts may have overlooked an important point, says an expert on law and religion at Washington University in St. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
In an opinion covering two suits-- one by a Sufi Muslim religious organization and the other by the United States--, an Illinois federal district court concluded that the city of Des Plaines, Illinois may well have violated RLUIPA and the 1st and 14th Amendments, as well as state law, in denying a zoning amendment that would allow the Muslim group to use property it had purchased for religious and educational purposes. [read post]
22 May 2010, 7:25 pm
United States, (WD WA, May 17, 2010), a Muslim woman brought various challenges to the manner in which law enforcement officers searched her apartment in a raid seeking evidence of khat distribution. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm
If, as the Court held in Hawaii v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:15 am
News:Oral argument in the case of State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:45 am
United States ruled that the woman could move ahead with her claim based on the common law tort of outrage. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 3:55 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that border autorities had the power to detain, search and question for several hours Muslim-Americans who attended an Islamic conference in Canada and then returned to the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:45 am
Or Nisrin, who was detained during the chaotic implementation of the first Muslim ban simply because of her Sudanese citizenship, although she has lived in the United States for 25 years. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:15 pm
Trump and Hawaii v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 7:21 am
Senate Appropriations Committee that white supremacists are “the greatest domestic security threat” in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:00 pm
In IRAP v. [read post]
