Search for: "United States v. Nadler"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
The University of Chicago Law Review has published articles from the “Understanding Education in the United States: Its Legal and Social Implications Symposium. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:13 pm
United States, No. 1:10-cv-8435 (S.D.N.Y.) and Pedersen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:46 pm
In Romer v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:53 am
Together we represent thousands of organizations that employ millions of workers in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:41 am
" In his post on the Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin discusses the possible reasons why the Solicitor General, in her petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:04 am
Nadler (D.N.Y.), along with Reps. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am
Puglia v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:47 am
Nadler’s manager’s amendment for the SHOP SAFE Act, which I think will be the basis of a committee markup hearing tomorrow. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:04 pm
” “Over the past year, the 6-3, far-right supermajority on the Supreme Court further gutted the Voting Rights Act, effectively overturned Roe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The Corporate Culture That Weighs Against Hobby Lobby Being a Religious Entity RFRA was not the first statute ever enacted in the United States and must be considered in light of entrenched understandings of law that preceded it. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 8:35 am
Turner Seyfarth Synopsis: Congress has once again proposed legislation that would seek to ban mandatory workplace arbitration of employment claims, despite a string of United States Supreme Court decisions upholding arbitration and class/collective action waivers as a lawful and appropriate mechanism to resolve workplace disputes. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Under Employment Div. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:25 am
” The United States has made no attempt to defend or justify what it had done to Arar. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
… “It’s not such a terrible thing to go on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Political Backing v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
In the United States, multiple federal bodies develop and enforce e-commerce counterfeit goods regulations. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
