Search for: "United States v. National City Lines, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm
At the heart of this case is a question similar to those that are under consideration by the United States Supreme Court in the Florida case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:52 pm
On June 15, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm
In a sense, Tuesday’s argument in American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 8:19 am
See New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
System, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
On February 21, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari for Lozman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Davey, with the court (per Chief Justice William Rehnquist) holding that, as to the funding of religious activity, a state may “draw[] a more stringent line than that drawn by the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
United States Department of Interior, et al. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:35 am
The court held that "for certain kinds of businesses (particularly cachet goods/services with highly mobile clienteles), goodwill can, and does, cross state and national boundary lines. [read post]