Search for: "United States v. National City Lines, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
EPA Clean Water Rule: WOTUS Field Hearing #2: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders Field Hearing #1: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders <> Nation's first federal combined solar power… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-6820, comes to us from the City of Brotherly Love. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm by Steven Boutwell
Despite the fact that hydraulic fracturing has been utilized in the United States for decades, within the past five years, hydraulic fracturing and its alleged impacts on human health and the environment has received increased attention and scrutiny from the media, Congress, the EPA, state regulatory agencies throughout the country, and local parish and city councils. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
The State Department once summarized the government’s view this way: “Any unilateral action by the United States that would signal, symbolically or concretely, that it recognizes that Jerusalem is a city that is located within the sovereign territory of Israel would critically compromise the ability of the United States to work with Israelis, Palestinians and others in the region to further the peace process. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States, that lower courts should look for and be guided by the “position taken by those Members [of the Court] who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds” (emphasis added). [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
”  The name Earl Warren should ring a bell, as he would later become the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, at the time that the Court heard the Brown v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy with the decision in United States v. [read post]