Search for: "United States v. National City Lines, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am by David Kopel
(David Kopel) To me, today’s decision of the United States District Court for the District of Utah in Brown v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) (stating that an airport’s proposed interpretation of a speech-restricting policy would be unconstitutionally vague, even if an airport were to be treated as a nonpublic forum); International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
The employees contend that the Seventh Circuit’s decision conflicted with the First Circuit’s holding in Tum v Barber Foods, Inc and, more importantly, with the High Court’s decision in IBP, Inc v Alvarez. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The January 11, 1988 edition of The National Law Journal described the litigation as “fast becoming the largest mass disaster litigation in United States history. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
That, in effect, has been the problem I posed for myself two years ago when I first was confronted with the task of adding content to the four lines of course description I set out above. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]