Search for: "United States v. National City Lines"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
United States, Steven L. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Depending on which source you consult, its violent crime rate hovers between three and four times the national average, and various publications describe it as one of the top 10 most violent cities in the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
If we could put the whole American body politic behind such a veil and ask them to create a new mechanism for the selection of a president, would they not be driven to adopt the mode of election that most readers of this symposium likely prefer: a national popular vote, to be conducted in a single constituency (let’s call it the collective United States of America, as opposed to fifty electorally autonomous states and the District of Columbia), with a… [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am
Here is our guide to the amici (we’ve highlighted the must-read briefs in red): The United States: Here. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:26 am
In its brief, the City Bar takes on the district court’s conclusion that a decades-old precedent about a narrow use of phone-records collection, Smith v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
When Chief Justice of the United States, Taney wrote the opinion for the Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
” The brief of the United States, arguing in support of petitioners, criticized the decisions of the circuit court and outlined the position of the United States regarding the expropriation exception. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 7:57 am
(V. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:41 pm
Nullification, he said, was shown to work.Whether the political impulse of states’ rights and nullification will become a direct political fault line in the national elections this fall is uncertain, said Mr. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:22 pm
Next Wednesday, October 8, 2008, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of Crawford v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:17 am
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:16 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:01 am
But it’s not bigger than the federal government or the Constitution of the United States of America.That’s the lesson the Third Circuit handed down today with its decision in the Lozano v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:01 am
The Black Hills, South Dakota, United States image from space Pursuant to the Treaty of Fort Laramie of April 29, 1868, 15 Stat. 635, 636, the United States confirmed in the Sioux Nation recognized title to all of the present-day South Dakota west of the Missouri River, and the government agreed to keep unauthorized persons out. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
., United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
§ 1350; ATS) which provides that “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
