Search for: "United States v. Nelson" Results 21 - 40 of 936
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 11:26 am by Stephen E. Sachs
They are adhering, not to the Constitution of the United States, but to a much higher law, Sturgeon's Law, which is that "90% of everything is crap. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It was a huge setback for efforts to dismantle the ongoing privilege of whiteness in the United States and is symptomatic of resistance among movement conservatives on and off the Court to efforts to build a more inclusive society.In both respects, Students for Fair Admissions is a deeply undemocratic decision. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
United States, which declared unconstitutional provisions of the Brady Act. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Greg Lambert
All right, Luis and Angel in Spain have been doing that for with his opponent countries over 35 years, and not just in the United States, but worldwide. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
  This had been the age of the liberal democratic markets driven order and its conception of development since the start of the 20th century and embedded in the law of globalization under the leadership of the United States. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
(In this way the "in lieu of" arguably resembles a non obstante clause, the subject of Caleb Nelson's great work on Preemption.) [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Unknown
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The United States Supreme Court can’t seem to make up its mind about race. [read post]