Search for: "United States v. Nelson" Results 381 - 400 of 949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am by Sean Wajert
United States, 893 P.2d 345 (Nev. 1995); Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Nelson is binding precedent as to petitioners’ constitutional claims. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
Which might start with a critique of the manner in which Judge O'Scannlain unhelpfully begins his opinion, with a first paragraph that reads (in its entirety): "We are called upon to decide whether an alien may be removed from the United States for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude as determined under federal immigration law. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:15 pm by Bridget Crawford
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:15 am
More recently, in exchange for providing the CIA with information about Libyans suspected of ties to international terrorism, the United States allowed Libya to interrogate prisoners at Guantánamo Bay. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States—a case raising crucial questions of religious freedom law and, most importantly, statutory interpretation. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
The decision was a clear break with the near-unanimous results of federal trial and appeals courts in the wake of the Justices’ ruling last year in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
In the meantime, the United States SupremeCourt took up the lethal injection issue in Baze v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
   "The Department of History at Temple University invites applications for a tenure track assistant professorship in the field of race and racism in crime, policing, and incarceration in the United States since 1787. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 6:44 am
Supreme court case of Caulder -v- Bull 3 U.S. 386 (1798) which states:"I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition. 1st. [read post]