Search for: "United States v. Nelson" Results 561 - 580 of 951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am by Unknown
Nelson, J.D.A group of 17 state attorneys general filed a motion to intervene in a proceeding before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) involving BlackRock, Inc. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   It did not do so, for example, in its most recent ruling in a major gay rights case — the 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm by John Neiman
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 1:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
The most important Supreme Court precedent on which lower courts have been relying in the recent rulings is United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On December 6, 2011, 261 East 78 Realty Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (id., ¶ 27). [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Another Reason to be Thankful — Energy Poverty in the United States – Philadelphia attorney Linda Evers of Stevens & Lee on the firm’s blog, Smart Grid Legal News NYU Acknowledges Bargaining Rights of Grad Students – Atlanta attorney Cary Burke of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Labor Relations Today Law Firm Merger Diligence–Are the Financial Metrics Compatible? [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The English High Court has recently rendered an insightful and thought provoking decision on the application of Art. 4 II and III of the Rome II Regulation  (Winrow v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Unknown
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681, 684-85 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Those challenges have alleged that Black defendants are more likely than White defendants to get death sentences, even when they commit comparable crimes.In 1972, the United States Supreme Court’s Furman v. [read post]