Search for: "United States v. Nelson" Results 61 - 80 of 875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am by Derek T. Muller
Nelson, Bade, Collins, and Lee) (joined by two senior judges, O'Scannlain and Trott), and Justice Neil Gorsuch repeatedly mentioned in his opinion that the Ninth Circuit’s decision was rendered over the dissenting views of at least 12 members of that court.The second is United States v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Payne is well known among those on death row in the United States because he was the plaintiff in an infamous Supreme Court case, Payne v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
United States—”anticanonical,” but not infamous.Perhaps he avoided the language of infamy because his analysis was empirical, rather than normative. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] 2 WLR 857 The case concerns the UK’s stance on the application of mutual legal assistance to the United States where doing so may result in the death penalty being carried out. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eleanor Runde
One type is head-of-state immunity, which attaches only to the individual recognized by the United States as the formal leader of the country. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
In determining that plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their Free Exercise claim, we also have no need to rely upon either South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
One of his legal advisors put it bluntly: “We’re waiting for the United States Supreme Court—of which the President has nominated three justices—to step in and do something. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
And it cannot prevent Congress from determining who the rightful electors are and discharging its exclusive responsibility to say who will serve as the next President of the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 8:06 am by Nelson Tebbe
By Netta Barak-Corren and Nelson TebbeOn November 4, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in Fulton v. [read post]