Search for: "United States v. Neptune"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
Multi-Jurisdictional Relief The Aker v Neptune case provides a practical example of the current multiple forms of relief concurrently available to both patentee and infringer, particularly following new “challenge” procedures introduced by the United States Patent and Trade-mark Office (“USPTO”) last September 2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
City of Neptune Beach, 410 F.3d 1250, 1266 (11th Cir. 2005), which dealt with ordinances nearly identical to the Norfolk ordinance. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:48 am
Today the statues of Cybele, Apollo and Neptune still with us. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:25 pm
In Southern States Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:21 am
This will be a historic visit by the Navajo Nation Supreme Court which has jurisdiction over the largest tribal land base and population in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 6:56 pm
The recently decided New Jersey Supreme Court decision of State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
First, “the public accusations by Van Liew that Stansfield was ‘corrupt and a liar’” were fully protected speech: These remarks about a local public official constituted political speech and were at the core of the speech that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
Appeals -- Certiorari -- No basis for certiorari review regarding grant of motion for protective order as to interrogatories and order declaring plaintiff a “vexatious litigant” -- Jurisdiction -- Appeal of dismissal for failure to state a cause of action with leave for plaintiff to amend is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the dismissal is a non-final orderPATRICK NEPTUNE, Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 12:48 pm
6174173 RESTORE 6174113 THREE LITTLE TOTS NICU MILESTONE CARDS 6174091 WHIMSIES 6173888 6173886 6173885 6173884 6173883 6173882 6173880 6173879 SPUR 6173877 SPUR 6173876 COUNTERSTRIKE TABLE TENNIS 6173614 RACK HUB 6173409 ROTTGANG 6173375 MOCCASIN WATER 6176678 MIDNIGHT BLACK 6176608 MARINE MAXX 6176602 OMNIPRO 6172986 NEPTUNE 6172985 KONG COOLERS 6172945 EASTERN EXPRESS INC. 6176433 TREKROLL 6176389 BUSHWHACKER RV 6176350 BRAHMA 6176256 JENNY’S PENNIES 6176218… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:04 pm
See Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound et al., v. [read post]
