Search for: "United States v. New River Co." Results 221 - 240 of 379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:17 am by Melissa De Witte
It symbolizes that women in the United States are full citizens, entitled like all others to participate actively in self-government. 1917 poster for the New York state campaign for voting rights for women. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: United States v. [read post]
The Project is owned and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and discharges significant quantities of selenium and other pollutants into state and federal wildlife refuges leading into the Delta. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP)   United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
The Board noted that it had stated in Oil Capitol that it would apply the new evidentiary requirement in the compliance proceeding of Oil Capitol and in all cases where the discriminatee is a union salt. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Sagamore Insurance Co. as the third and final act (following on the two acts of Toller v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The more interesting part of the decision concerns the plaintiffs’ direct, contract claim alleging that the issuance of the treasury shares without payment violated the operating agreement’s provision stating that the Class C treasury units “will only be issued as Class C Units, unless purchased/assigned to Class A Member(s). [read post]