Search for: "United States v. New River Co." Results 281 - 300 of 398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
No “anti-arbitrating” presumption to resolving grievances alleging a violation of a collective bargaining agreementWatertown CSD v Watertown Education AssociationIndian River CSD v Indian River Education AssociationCourt of Appeals, Nos. 50 & 51, joint decision issued 93 NY2d 132In numerous decisions, New York State courts have frowned on the use of arbitration to settle disputes between public employers and unions unless the… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:58 am by Sean Wajert
It was built between 1958 and 1965 by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am by Steven M. Taber
Simplot Co. to reduce the flow of phosphorus into the Portneuf River near Pocatello are paying off. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
– EPA News Release, August 10, 2010 Tanco Kansas City, LLP, a bulk materials storage facility, has agreed to pay a $97,845 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated federal laws by failing to properly document its storage of sulfuric acid and prepare a Facility Response Plan (FRP) to guard against spills of its materials into a tributary of the Missouri River. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania is a coal-mining town along the Susquehanna River, in the Wyoming Valley. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]