Search for: "United States v. New River Co." Results 21 - 40 of 387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District  of New York. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:01 pm by NARF
United States (Partition Trust Land; Administrative Procedures Act) United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:24 pm by Elizabeth Strunk
  Congress, however, created an exception to this rule providing that pilots in “bays, rivers, harbors, and ports of the United States” are regulated by state laws.3  This power, held by the states, existed prior to the formation of the Constitution and was originally ratified in the Lighthouse Act of 1789. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:23 am by Jon L. Gelman
The Route 3 Bridge spans the Lower Passaic River from Clifton to Rutherford, New Jersey at River Mile 11.8. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 9:40 pm
Louisiana's Becnel Law Firm has already filed suit on behalf of the homeowners, a proposed class action, and the federal suit is now pending before the Honorable Zainey in the United States Eastern District Court of Louisiana (09-2981). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Co., pending in the Southern District of New York, Lantheus sued Zurich, its insurer, for failure to pay on a lost business income claim arising out of the shutdown of a nuclear reactor in Chalk River, Ontario. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Co., pending in the Southern District of New York, Lantheus sued Zurich, its insurer, for failure to pay on a lost business income claim arising out of the shutdown of a nuclear reactor in Chalk River, Ontario. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Co., pending in the Southern District of New York, Lantheus sued Zurich, its insurer, for failure to pay on a lost business income claim arising out of the shutdown of a nuclear reactor in Chalk River, Ontario. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm by Rick E. Rayl
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
No “anti-arbitrating” presumption to resolving grievances alleging a violation of a collective bargaining agreementWatertown CSD v Watertown Education AssociationIndian River CSD v Indian River Education AssociationCourt of Appeals, Nos. 50 & 51, joint decision issued 93 NY2d 132In numerous decisions, New York State courts have frowned on the use of arbitration to settle disputes between public employers and unions unless the… [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:32 pm by NARF
United States (Sovereign Immunity; Quiet Title Act) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Sault Ste. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:42 pm by Joel R. Brandes
During their time in the United States, until or around May 14, 2019, the parties primarily lived in the basement of Respondent’s brother, in Toms River, New Jersey. [read post]
The landowner challenged the determination and the Corps issued its approved JD stating that the wetland was a “water of the United States” because of its “significant nexus” to the Red River, which is 120 miles away. [read post]