Search for: "United States v. Noriega" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2010, 3:58 pm
And given the ostensible justification -- stated fears of trying these particular defendants on American soil -- the changes would undermine the authority and legitimacy of all federal courts in the United States.? [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:33 am by Adam Chandler
United Press International offers an in-depth preview of Holder v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am by Anna Christensen
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:54 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Recall that Section 5 provided as follows: "No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:20 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Recall that Section 5 provided as follows: "No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:32 am by Erin Miller
The Volokh Conspiracy again covers the Court's denial of cert. in Noriega v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am by Adam Chandler
Last Thursday's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:09 pm by Kenneth Anderson
I read with interest Justice Thomas' dissent in Noriega v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am by Jay Willis
The Jurist reports on the Court's decision to deny cert. in Noriega v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:34 am
  Today I want to praise Justice Thomas for his dissent from the denial of certiorari in Noriega v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a "closely watched federal tax case involving the scope of the work-product doctrine. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm by John Elwood
As Noreiga's reply brief states, "[t]he decision below affects the rights of hundreds of prisoners in United States' custody. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]