Search for: "United States v. Norris" Results 121 - 140 of 187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am by Nabiha Syed
Omega, in which an equally divided Court affirmed a Ninth Circuit decision that limited the first-sale doctrine to items made in the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:33 am by Colin Miller
This was a fairly bold statement by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm by cdw
United States,  2010 U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Our most recent in-depth human rights case comments: Removal of child following faulty diagnosis of injury breached Article 8 ((AD and OD v United Kingdom (Application No 28680/06)) Exceptionally serious circumstances must be established to resist extradition order says Supreme Court (Norris v United States ) EU Directive on Refugee status does not enhance asylum rights under Strasbourg Convention (The Queen on the Application of… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Rosalind English
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am by sally
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by sally
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) Supreme Court “Only the gravest effects of interference with family life would make extradition disproportionate to the public interest in the prevention of crime. [read post]