Search for: "United States v. Norris"
Results 121 - 140
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
” Finally, the court reminds counsel that Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of legal authority in the United States District Courts. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:08 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has upheld an 18-month prison sentence in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:51 am
The case involved the unsettled state of the federal pleading requirements since the United States Supreme Court decided Twombly and Iqbal. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
Of course, the criminalisation of homosexuality was discussed in Parliament in the same era and that didn’t stop the UK and Ireland from having to revisit that issue at the behest of Strasbourg decisions in Dudgeon v UK and Norris v Ireland. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:22 am
Supreme Court decision in Hall v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
Omega, in which an equally divided Court affirmed a Ninth Circuit decision that limited the first-sale doctrine to items made in the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am
See Norris [v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:49 pm
We've added a link to the full judgment in Norris v Government of United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:33 am
This was a fairly bold statement by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:55 pm
Norris, 512 U.S. 246, 261 (1994). [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:24 am
The case is Dukes v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:00 pm
Our most recent in-depth human rights case comments: Removal of child following faulty diagnosis of injury breached Article 8 ((AD and OD v United Kingdom (Application No 28680/06)) Exceptionally serious circumstances must be established to resist extradition order says Supreme Court (Norris v United States ) EU Directive on Refugee status does not enhance asylum rights under Strasbourg Convention (The Queen on the Application of… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:34 pm
Clark and Dixon v. [read post]
