Search for: "United States v. North American Co." Results 21 - 40 of 739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am by John Coyle
Meanwhile, lower courts struggled with how to fit the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 2:49 pm
Supp. 2d 109, 123 (D.D.C. 2004).The evidence shows that Respondents set prices on a regional basis; that the North America region includes the United States and Canada, but not Mexico; that chloride TiO2 manufacturers deliver their product to their North American customers’ locations; and that North American customers could not defeat a price increase through arbitrage. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:22 am by Docket Navigator
[N]o evidence demonstrates that any of [defendant's] conduct or activity is any more specifically directed at this state than it is at the North American market as a whole. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:32 pm by NARF
United States (Sovereign Immunity; Quiet Title Act) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Sault Ste. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:23 am by K. Hollyn Hollman
She is an adjunct professor of law at the Georgetown University Law Center, where she co-teaches the Church-State Law Seminar. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Even if Minnesota claimed that pollution emitters in North Dakota were harming the state, Minnesota couldn't hale the North Dakota emitters to court. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:00 pm by Angela France
In a unanimous recent opinion, the United States Supreme Court broadly construed the term “person aggrieved” in Title VII's antiretaliation provision to include a co-worker who is a relative or close associate of a targeted employee. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
Problem 14 --David Schultz, The State of Democracy in North Dakota --Notes and Questions -- Shaun Bowler When Is It OK to Limit Direct Democracy C. [read post]