Search for: "United States v. North Carolina"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
But that may change after the North Carolina Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:44 pm
As an immediate result of the act, hundreds of men were indicted in North Carolina, while United States Attorney G. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
For the proposition that regulations that would have been valid in 1791 are valid today, Justice Thomas cites one case, the 2010 ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm
There Is No Federal Drug Testing Law for Private Employers in the United StatesCheck Your State - and Check With Counsel! [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 2:30 pm
In 2016, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held in State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm
State of Hawaii complements the Circuit's en banc from five years earlier, Peruta v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
United States Dep’t of State, 347 F. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
United States Dep’t of State, 347 F. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:22 am
This post summarizes a decision released by the United States Supreme Court on March 25, 2021. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court stated in Seminole Nation v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
Term of post-release supervision under North Carolina law counted as part of the state sentence for purposes of federal sentencing enhancement U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 5:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 8:15 am
The amici states, New Mexico, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington, as represented by their attorneys general, argue that the Second Circuit's judgment should be affirmed. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina; David S. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:41 pm
In Lake v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:48 am
Holding: Rationale: Defendant contended that his due process rights, afforded to him under the United States Constitution as well as the North Carolina Constitution, were violated due to the 19-month delay in entry of the ED Order from the hearing date. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:19 am
J.D.B. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
North Carolina. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 3:45 am
The firm represents clients throughout North Carolina and the United States. [read post]
