Search for: "United States v. North Carolina"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,794
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2017, 12:17 pm
North Carolina, No. 15–1194. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
"South California" does have precedent on its side (North and South Carolina, North and South Dakota, and West Virginia). [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
Supreme CourtIn Allen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 9:37 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:44 am
The Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaim was therefore granted.The Court did not resolve a parallel ground for the Motion to Dismiss: whether North Carolina still recognizes a claim for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
And those 26 states have now been joined by the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:49 am
United States, ___ F. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
North Carolina moved to dismiss the action on the grounds of sovereign immunity. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
North Carolina moved to dismiss the action on the grounds of sovereign immunity. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:48 am
In 2015, the Fourth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals decided a significant case yesterday, ruling in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals decided a significant case yesterday, ruling in State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
Notwithstanding these facts, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held that because (1) defendants did not purposefully limit their distribution to exclude their tires from North Carolina, (2) defendants did business generally with the United States and (3) North Carolina had a strong interest in providing a forum for its citizens to seek redress for their claims, the assertion of general personal jurisdiction over… [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
Craig wrote that North Carolina’s alienation-of-affections cause of action is unconstitutional because it infringes on people’s rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitutions. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State University as a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Waldburger, the Court held that the federal Superfund law does not preempt North Carolina’s statute of repose, which bars state-law tort claims more than ten years after the defendant’s last culpable act. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
Neither North Carolina, any other state, nor the United States of America has the ability to dictate the definition of Religious Marriage. [read post]
