Search for: "United States v. North Carolina" Results 601 - 620 of 2,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2015, 5:00 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
The post A Note on Same-Sex Marriage Before Diving into Innocent Spouse Relief appeared first on North Carolina Divorce Lawyers Blog. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:56 pm by Lawrence Solum
Marshall (University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law) has posted Judicial Takings, Judicial Speech, and Doctrinal Acceptance of the Model of the Judge as Political Actor (Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:06 am
And Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court in North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 6:43 am by John Day
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to consider E.M.A. ex rel. [read post]
These additional states include Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, and Wisconsin. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:55 am by Steven Cohen
World Programming Limited – United States District Court – Eastern District of North Carolina – August 25th, 2015) involves the breach of a license agreement by the Defendant (“WPL”) upon one of Plaintiffs (“SAS”) software products. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
America’s Communal Utopias (University of North Carolina Press, 1997). [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
This post deals with an opinion recently issued by the Court of Appeals of North CarolinaState v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am by Kathy Darvil
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 4:12 pm by Shea Denning
The North Carolina Court of Appeals has, on more than one occasion, favorably cited the Fourth Circuit’s statement in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am by Jacquelyn Greene
In addition, the Supreme Court of North Carolina has held that the list of factors to be considered for transfer, contained in the appendix of the Kent decision, are not binding on North Carolina (citing State v. [read post]