Search for: "United States v. North Carolina" Results 661 - 680 of 2,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Jamie Markham
As stated by the Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm by Pete Strom
In part, this was due to the Feres Doctrine (Feres v. the United States, 340 U.S. 135), which prohibits individuals from filing a lawsuit or lawsuit based on injuries during their service. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:18 am by Jeff Welty
The post News Roundup appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am by Helen White
Harper, members of the North Carolina state legislature (the petitioners) are invoking the ISL theory to claim that the North Carolina state courts violated the federal constitution when they found congressional maps drawn by the legislature to violate the state constitution. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Jamie Markham
As stated by the Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
The post News Roundup appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North and South Carolina) affirmed the bankruptcy court’s decision to dismiss the debtors’ Chapter 7 case based on the totality of the circumstances under 11 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Smedley v Smedley, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5647426 (C.A.4 (N.C.)) the Smedleys married in 2000 in Germany, where Mark was stationed as a member of the United States Army. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Welty
The right to carry firearms openly has been protected in North Carolina at least as far back as State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by Alex Phipps
After the first review of defendant’s case, the North Carolina Supreme Court remanded the case for reconsideration in light of State v. [read post]