Search for: "United States v. North Carolina" Results 141 - 160 of 2,877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm by Jamie Markham
This post summarizes an opinion issued by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 20, 2020, and opinions issued by the Court of Appeals of North Carolina on April 21, 2020. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:32 pm by Kyle Green
After the October 6, 2014 argument in front of the United States Supreme Court, attorneys for Nicholas Heien and the attorneys for the state of North Carolina finally received a decision on December 15, 2014 for the Heien v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 9:07 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  This amendment provides an opportunity to set down a baseline of eminent domain protection and bring North Carolina into line with the rest of the United States that have already granted similar protections to their property owners. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:44 am by Brian A. Buchanan
” The United State Constitution, as well as the North Carolina Constitution require the government to pay “just compensation” when taking land for public purposes. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 8:54 am by WIMS
The United States moved to dismiss the case, arguing that the North Carolina statute of repose, the District Court disagreed, concluding that a provision of CERCLA preempted North Carolina's statute of repose. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by M. Jeanette Pitts
Because the new statute does not include the procedural protections present in the federal pretrial detention statute upheld in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As I have noted, Republicans in North Carolina (and Pennsylvania too) have been invoking the theory over the last few weeks to challenge state court rulings that rejected (and replaced) congressional district lines drawn by the state legislatures. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
North Carolina, 2018) the district court granted the Father’s motion for a preliminary restraining order prohibiting the removal of the Child, N.R.A., from the Eastern District of North Carolina pending the preliminary injunction hearing;” and directing the relinquishment of the Child’s travel documents, including his Mexican and American passports, to the United States Marshal.The court observed that “A plaintiff seeking… [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:47 am by Andrew Hamm
North Carolina (13-604), Zivotofsky v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:24 pm by Jeff Welty
The post United States Supreme Court Rejects Another Challenge to Another Method of Lethal Injection But Leaves the Door Open to Future Litigation appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]