Search for: "United States v. Norton" Results 141 - 160 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
Norton Simon Museum of Art, 592 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit invalidated a California law that extended the State statute of limitations for claims seeking recovery of Holocaust-era artwork. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
Norton Simon Museum of Art, 592 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit invalidated a California law that extended the State statute of limitations for claims seeking recovery of Holocaust-era artwork. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has cut more than US$12 million from damages awarded to an intern who sued a chief executive for sexual harassment and defamation. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
In One Nation Under God, Kruse argues that the idea of the United States as a Christian nation does not find its origins with the founding of the United States or the writing of the Constitution. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In other news New South Wales may become the first state to institute laws for invasions of privacy, after the State Parliament’s law and justice committee recommended that NSW should “lead the way” in Australia with laws of this type. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am by UK Supreme Court Yearbook
’ The Rt Hon Sir Jack Beatson FBA, ‘The New Model Judiciary and the Other Two Branches of State’ The Hon Justice Mark Leeming, ‘Ministerial Override Certificates and the Law/Fact Distinction – A Comparison Between Australia and the United Kingdom’ Philip Cayford QC, ‘Wyatt v Vince – Climate Change in the Family Division? [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:28 am by Broc Romanek
As noted in this Paul Weiss memo, on the first day of the US Supreme Court’s 2015-16 term, SCOTUS declined take up the government’s petition for writ of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:52 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
Cook, 87 Mass.App.Ct. 382 (2015), evaluating whether the procedural and substantive requirements set out in the United States House and Urban Development (HUD) regulations were satisfied by Wells Fargo in a foreclosure case. [read post]