Search for: "United States v. O'CONNOR" Results 41 - 60 of 225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2011, 6:15 am by Nabiha Syed
In an op-ed for the New York Times, Jeffrey Rosen discusses United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:36 pm by Dwight Sullivan
See R.C.M. 705(c)(1)(B) (“A term or condition in a pretrial agreement shall not be enforced if it deprives the accused of: . . . the complete and effective exercise of post-trial and appellate rights”); see also United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Amanda Rice
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case.  [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today's roundup is quite heavy on United States v.  [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am by Guest Author
WINER, professor of law, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz.    [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:53 am by Adam Chandler
Plans for a legislative response to the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm by Steve Vladeck
Finally, the Supreme Court has not really taken a significant state sovereign immunity case since Justice O'Connor's parting gift in Central Virginia Community College v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
It is unclear whether the United States Supreme Court will agree to hear this case, and, if so, whether it will overturn the Hawaii Supreme Court's decision relying on Kelo. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:40 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
Unable to show “coercion” of their religious beliefs, the Indian plaintiffs could not rely on the First Amendment to protect their interests in aboriginal territory now owned by the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:01 am by Amanda Rice
However, The BLT’s Tony Mauro quotes two “judicial ethics experts” who argue that Code of Conduct for United States Judges does not apply to Supreme Court justices, and that even if it did, there is nothing “ethically wrong with O’Connor has done.”  [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]