Search for: "United States v. O'CONNOR" Results 81 - 100 of 225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2010, 3:59 pm by Big Tent Democrat
S. 793, 810-814 (2000) (plurality opinion); id., at 841-844 (O'Connor, J., concurring in judgment); Agostini, supra, at 225-227; Rosenberger v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am by Matt Sundquist
Retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who as an Arizona state senator was “instrumental in establishing the current system,” opposes changes to the selection process. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:06 am by Ilya Somin
As Kennedy put it for the Court in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:04 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column, I explain why Monday's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:29 am by Ted Frank
[Beck] Clifford Taylor takes on Sandra Day O'Connor on judicial elections and "merit selection" at Wayne State U conference. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by James Bickford
At Slate, Bert Brandenburg discusses criticism of efforts made by retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor to promote the appointment, rather than election, of state judges, arguing that “[w]e need judges in our public debates, because no one else can tell us what’s going on from the inside of the courts.”  [read post]
28 May 2012, 7:07 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia explains, in “the United States federal courts, magistrate judges are appointed to assist United States district court judges in the performance of their duties.”  [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
Breyer discussed Bush v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 1:00 pm by Mehmet Munur
The Supreme Court started out with the discussion of the 4th Amendment jurisprudence, including the case of O’Connor v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:24 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Oregon, where Roberts would have let the United States attorney general keep doctors from prescribing the suicide drugs that were authorized by Oregon law. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:21 am by Amanda Rice
Also at SCOTUSblog, Briggs Matheson discusses Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]