Search for: "United States v. Olson" Results 101 - 120 of 448
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
Olson and far more basic misunderstandings about what these bills would actually do. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Bob Bauer
United States for the proposition that there are limits to congressional impeachment authority where the president acts to remove a subordinate official. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Article I, for example, provided that Clinton “willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States” by “impeding the administration of justice. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by David Houck
On Nov. 17, 2017, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened for the purpose of receiving testimony from Professor Ellen Yaroshefsky, an ethics advisor to defendant’s learned counsel Richard Kammen, who had previously resigned over undisclosed ethics concerns. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm by Josh Blackman
United States held that Congress cannot strip the president’s absolute authority to fire officers who are subject to his control. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
When last we left Lawfare readers, the prosecution in the United States v. al-Nashiri military commission had begun “preadmission” of evidence despite the ongoing refusal of defense counsel to participate. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Grant
Pretrial activities in United States v. al-Nashiri shifted focus Nov. 8 and 10, as the prosecution began presenting witnesses and physical evidence from the USS Cole for preadmission by presiding judge Col. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Grant
Military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri continued Nov. 7 with military judge Col. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
Had Congress not allowed the independent counsel provision upheld in 1988 in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 10:31 am by Rick Pildes
It is black-letter law, under United States v. [read post]