Search for: "United States v. Omaha Tribe of Indians" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v… [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Gregory Ablavsky
The history of Indian Territory, Oklahoma statehood, and the Creek and other Native nations is, like much Native history in the United States, tangled; if you are interested, you can find an amicus brief that I joined that delves into that complexity here. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm by Unknown
Harrington (Prisoner Civil Rights)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlHwal'Bay Ba J Enterpises v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm by Will Baude
In fact, everyone, from Nebraska to the Tribe to the United States treated Pender as not part of the reservation for over a century. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
The act said that “all non-citizen Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States be, and they are hereby, declared to be citizens of the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But these cases are so different (yes, Dollar General consented to tribal jurisdiction, and yes, the United States authorized the Omaha Tribe to tax liquor) it shouldn’t matter at all. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
  That 1872 ruling, in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am by Jay Yurkiw
Likewise, in Kicapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
No one disputed that Elk was born within the territorial limits of the United States, but in 1884’s Elk v. [read post]