Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks"
Results 241 - 260
of 514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:42 am
(Even dorm rooms are protected here; see, State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:26 pm
The EEOC has repeatedly stated its intention to continue to litigate background check cases despite its initial string of embarrassing losses on this issue. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:21 pm
In this case, the Second Circuit asks when that one year clock begins to run.The case is Rosa v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court Decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
We’ll skip the ritual incantations about how an opinion surely must be circulating in at least one of these cases. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:22 am
Sember was “indicted for stealing certain United States Air Force sensitive and proprietary technical, engineering and computer data and codes having a value in excess of $1,000 in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm
The United States also filed an amicus brief supporting the challengers. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:37 pm
The cases were removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on diversity grounds. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir.1982) (“Recognizing that there are often great inequalities in bargaining power between employers and employees, Congress made the FLSA’s provisions mandatory. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir.1982) (“Recognizing that there are often great inequalities in bargaining power between employers and employees, Congress made the FLSA’s provisions mandatory. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 pm
The latter point has attracted a great deal of commentary to date, but some of that commentary has overlooked important details, so please don’t forget to read Section V at the end. [read post]
