Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks" Results 441 - 460 of 517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Vidal case out of New York City, one of several consolidated cases before the justices today. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
--An action under paragraph (1)(A) shall be governed under the rules and procedures set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United States Code. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:59 am by Elizabeth Bowersox, McAfee & Taft
XPO is a company that provides logistics and transportation services throughout the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:59 am by Elizabeth Bowersox, McAfee & Taft
XPO is a company that provides logistics and transportation services throughout the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am by Wendy Akbar
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am by Wendy Akbar
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  The question of what “serious” means and how it should be proved has been a vexing one. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Since 2003, a third of the net new jobs created in the United States were in Texas. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney
Since November 2011, two of the 19 cited or arrested have entered guilty pleas (one via a plea in abeyance), one resolved her case through a bench trial and another’s case was filed in juvenile court. 15. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Lexum
As it is often the case, the improvement made to serve one may ends up serving all others. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:46 am by Michael Lowe
  According to the Supreme Court of the United States, it’s not entrapment:  it’s doing what’s necessary to catch a criminal. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]