Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks" Results 61 - 80 of 582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2018, 6:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It also addresses whether certain criminal proceedings in which third parties claim an interest in forfeited property are civil or criminal.The case is United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Outside of the five main executing states of Texas, Virginia, Oklahoma, Missouri and Florida, this figure rises to one in five for the remaining 28 jurisdictions that have executed since 1977. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  This decision out the United States District Court for the Southern District of California becomes one in a growing series of court decisions decertifying automatic meal period deduction class actions due to the lack of common proof. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
Circuit turned to this question, in the case of Hentif v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 11:16 am by Holland & Hart
The lawsuits were consolidated into one case before United States District Judge James Mahan. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Rather, the only parties that could bring the claim are the alien’s associates (relative or organization) within the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Jayesh Rathod
Nevertheless, the case presents a compelling question of statutory interpretation, and has the potential to affect thousands of noncitizens with criminal records who face removal from the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:28 pm
But there exist two main differences between the cases, one which would seem to weigh in Chi's favor, one against. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 10:32 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of North CarolinaOpinion Date: 6/30/09Cite: Philips Electronics North America Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:23 am by Greg Mersol
United States Steel Corp., Case No. 12-417 (Jan. 27, 2014), addressing donning and doffing claims in the context of a unionized steel mill. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
A federal district court in California refused to exercise jurisdiction in a wage and hour action brought for violations of the California Labor Code and other state laws and seeking PAGA penalties, finding that the evidence proffered by the defendant fell short of the preponderance of the evidence standard espoused in the United States Supreme Court’s Standard Fire decision to establish the amount in controversy in CAFA cases. [read post]