Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks"
Results 81 - 100
of 563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
Under the rule, the clock will stop when the alien has committed an offense referred to in section 1182(a)(2) of this title that renders the alien inadmissible to the United States under section 1182(a)(2) of this title or removable from the United States under section 1227(a)(2) or 1227(a)(4) of this title. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
Nevertheless, the case presents a compelling question of statutory interpretation, and has the potential to affect thousands of noncitizens with criminal records who face removal from the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Ninth's Decision is Clear and Convincing -- Valle and Sentencing Standard of Proof
13 Oct 2019, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
” In Nixon v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:37 am
In Acorda Therapeutics v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am
Here, the person who has been arrested also faces a federal fight against being deported and removed from the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
” That case was explicitly relied on by a conservative majority in this past year’s Rucho v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
United States, No. 18-1851 C (Ct. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
In the travel-ban case, Trump v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:33 am
This case shows that the so-called "rule of completeness" has its limits.The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
Plus, I suppose, if you want to be super-technical, one more than three: Jordan v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:57 am
In Rubinstein v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:46 am
According to the Supreme Court of the United States, it’s not entrapment: it’s doing what’s necessary to catch a criminal. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 8:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
