Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks" Results 101 - 120 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am by Jayesh Rathod
Under the rule, the clock will stop when the alien has committed an offense referred to in section 1182(a)(2) of this title that renders the alien inadmissible to the United States under section 1182(a)(2) of this title or removable from the United States under section 1227(a)(2) or 1227(a)(4) of this title. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Jayesh Rathod
Nevertheless, the case presents a compelling question of statutory interpretation, and has the potential to affect thousands of noncitizens with criminal records who face removal from the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by Michael Lowe
  Here, the person who has been arrested also faces a federal fight against being deported and removed from the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am by Florian Mueller
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:33 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case shows that the so-called "rule of completeness" has its limits.The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
Plus, I suppose, if you want to be super-technical, one more than three: Jordan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:46 am by Michael Lowe
  According to the Supreme Court of the United States, it’s not entrapment:  it’s doing what’s necessary to catch a criminal. [read post]