Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks" Results 101 - 120 of 586
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
From 1969 to 1987, American military commanders could prosecute UCMJ offenses only when the circumstances of the case demonstrated some nexus to military affairs. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:00 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
It was also the law that applied in two cases that are now part of the VARA Hall of Fame: Mass MoCA v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Professor Vishnubhakat was an author of amicus briefs by Professors of Patent and Administrative Law in Wi-Fi One v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Margaret Taylor
The Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires high-level officers of the United States to be appointed through nomination by the president, with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:16 pm by Anthony Zaller
  Illustrative of this, the Plaintiffs in the action dismissed all non-California law claims following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Claimant lawyers dealing with pre-publication matters will doubtless rely on certain observations made by Nickin J about the Second Defendant’s conduct in the case of Turley v UNITE the Union & Anor [2019] EWHC 3547. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:03 am by Chris Castle
Many welcome the passing of the renegotiated North American Free Trade Agreement, known as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Vidal case out of New York City, one of several consolidated cases before the justices today. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am by Jayesh Rathod
Under the rule, the clock will stop when the alien has committed an offense referred to in section 1182(a)(2) of this title that renders the alien inadmissible to the United States under section 1182(a)(2) of this title or removable from the United States under section 1227(a)(2) or 1227(a)(4) of this title. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Jayesh Rathod
Nevertheless, the case presents a compelling question of statutory interpretation, and has the potential to affect thousands of noncitizens with criminal records who face removal from the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]