Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks"
Results 101 - 120
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2020, 8:08 am
Gadzinski v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:59 am
XPO is a company that provides logistics and transportation services throughout the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:59 am
XPO is a company that provides logistics and transportation services throughout the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
” Instead, the Framers drafted a Constitution that required the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” for the appointment of “Officers of the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
United States. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
From 1969 to 1987, American military commanders could prosecute UCMJ offenses only when the circumstances of the case demonstrated some nexus to military affairs. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:12 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Barton v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am
Professor Vishnubhakat was an author of amicus briefs by Professors of Patent and Administrative Law in Wi-Fi One v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
The Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires high-level officers of the United States to be appointed through nomination by the president, with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
Claimant lawyers dealing with pre-publication matters will doubtless rely on certain observations made by Nickin J about the Second Defendant’s conduct in the case of Turley v UNITE the Union & Anor [2019] EWHC 3547. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:26 pm
Wilts United Dairies, Ltd. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:03 am
Many welcome the passing of the renegotiated North American Free Trade Agreement, known as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
Vidal case out of New York City, one of several consolidated cases before the justices today. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
Under the rule, the clock will stop when the alien has committed an offense referred to in section 1182(a)(2) of this title that renders the alien inadmissible to the United States under section 1182(a)(2) of this title or removable from the United States under section 1227(a)(2) or 1227(a)(4) of this title. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
Nevertheless, the case presents a compelling question of statutory interpretation, and has the potential to affect thousands of noncitizens with criminal records who face removal from the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]