Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks"
Results 141 - 160
of 582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2010, 10:32 am
“It is one thing for a passerby to observe or even to follow someone during a single journey as he goes to the market or returns home from work,” Ginsburg wrote for the unanimous panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:15 am
In a new video featuring ACLU client Gavin Grimm and his mom Deirdre Grimm, the two reflect on Gavin’s fight to be treated with dignity and respect by his school board in Gloucester County, Virginia — a journey that has taken them all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States where his case will be heard on March 28. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm
Petitioner and Z.M.F.Z. were both dual citizens of the United States and Mexico. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am
They also explored how the United States can strike a “balance between privacy, security and the economic imperatives driving innovation” among other topics. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am
This was the rule since Marbury v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
Whatever the legal reasoning, the optics are very bad on this one, and whether intentionally or not, they stoke the perception that the Justices are in league with the Catholic bishops in the latter’s attempt to turn the clock back on not just Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am
Professor Vishnubhakat was an author of amicus briefs by Professors of Patent and Administrative Law in Wi-Fi One v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:11 am
United States, one might quarrel over whether an annually-imposed levy on consumer-owned carriages was direct or indirect. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Ninth's Decision is Clear and Convincing -- Valle and Sentencing Standard of Proof
13 Oct 2019, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
The text of the case follows. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:09 am
In a matter of first impression, the Court addressed the impact the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Desert Palace, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
“But only one case has applied equitable tolling to extend the time in which federal criminal charges may be brought, and that case — the United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 12:31 am
United States, a Federal Circuit decision affirming the Court of International Trade is a good example.The issue here was whether protests were timely filed. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
State, 3D13-1678, Oct. 1, 2014).We have been quoted in the press on more than a few cases as saying that "there are no winners in this case". [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 9:02 am
United Airlines and Oman v. [read post]
