Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks" Results 161 - 180 of 563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2007, 4:47 am
The result here is consistent with the Sixth Circuit's rulings in cases like United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
In March of 2006, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
SiegfriedOur firm's founder, Steven Siegfried and I are very pleased to have prevailed on behalf of one of our community association clients before the Third District Court of Appeal in the opinion filed this Wednesday, Dec. 17, in the case of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Derek Dissinger
I must admit that as a lawyer I pay very little attention to most decisions of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am by Andrew Frisch
United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir.1982) (“Recognizing that there are often great inequalities in bargaining power between employers and employees, Congress made the FLSA’s provisions mandatory. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am by Andrew Frisch
United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir.1982) (“Recognizing that there are often great inequalities in bargaining power between employers and employees, Congress made the FLSA’s provisions mandatory. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Louis Art Museum (SLAM) on February 15, 2011 filed a lawsuit against the United States seeking a declaratory judgment in the case of the Ka-Nefer-Nefer mummy mask. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:51 am by Ronald Mann
United States was an unusual argument, as the justices seemed to come to the bench resolved to settle the case with an answer proposed by neither of the parties. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
The United States also filed an amicus brief supporting the challengers. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 5:56 am by Dennis Crouch
App. 95, 98 (2014), the CAVC held that an RO has to check with both the NPRC and the Department of the Army in verifying active service, thus an RO cannot rely on the conclusion of only one of those entities in denying a claim for lack of proof of active service in the United States Armed Forces. [read post]