Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks" Results 161 - 180 of 582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Carolyn Shapiro is associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm by John Ellis
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:29 pm by James Yang
The Federal Circuit identified factors relevant to determining whether a use is experimental in Clock Spring, L.P. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Mich. 1997) (submitting a Hague Convention application to the State Department does not stop the one-year clock). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
The case for moot court this year was Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court released four decisions, including one in a high-profile case with significant implications for ecommerce. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
At this point, all we know is that there are 2 boxes, which might mean 2 new cases.ADDED: One of the cases is Lucia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm by Mark Walsh
“God save the United States and this honorable court,” she says, again struggling to get the words out. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:50 am by Deborah Pearlstein
  Most views cluster around the conclusion I tend to share: the question whether the President can be compelled to testify was formally left open by United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm by Adam Levitin
All of which is to say that perhaps this is a rule, perhaps it is, and no one really knows conclusively. [read post]