Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks"
Results 161 - 180
of 585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Another case is started. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:29 pm
The Federal Circuit identified factors relevant to determining whether a use is experimental in Clock Spring, L.P. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm
Mich. 1997) (submitting a Hague Convention application to the State Department does not stop the one-year clock). [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
The Justice Department appealed, but in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
The case for moot court this year was Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am
United States and Cox v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court released four decisions, including one in a high-profile case with significant implications for ecommerce. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
At this point, all we know is that there are 2 boxes, which might mean 2 new cases.ADDED: One of the cases is Lucia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm
“God save the United States and this honorable court,” she says, again struggling to get the words out. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:50 am
Most views cluster around the conclusion I tend to share: the question whether the President can be compelled to testify was formally left open by United States v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:22 pm
” Citing Clock Spring, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
The second case is Pereira v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm
All of which is to say that perhaps this is a rule, perhaps it is, and no one really knows conclusively. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
A case in point are the attacks during the investigation of President Bill Clinton on the Special Division of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, accused of partisan mischief replacing of Robert Fiske with Ken Starr. [read post]
