Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Property" Results 1 - 20 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:10 am by Ben Rubin
United States, the Federal Circuit addressed this question head on, concluding, to the surprise of no one, that the answer will largely depend upon the unique facts in each case. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 1:28 pm by Robert Thomas (
As Professor Lee Fennell recently wrote, title to fee simple parcels in the foundation on which our concept of private property is built: Nearly all privately owned real estate in the United States is held in fee simple absolute, or fee simple for short. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (
Id. at 17 ("The United States Supreme Court has long recognized that '[a] contract is property, and, like any other property, may be taken under condemnation proceedings for public use.'"). [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Ilya Somin
But they rejected the state of Wisconsin’s position that the courts should simply treat contiguous parcels as one anytime state law indicates they should be. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
There are also in the estate three other parcels of real estate which are now co-owned by the three brothers, which I will refer to as Wentworth Avenue, a property containing two units, a Yeo Street property containing eight units and a Mosman property containing two units. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:59 pm by Bona Law PC
There are, however, two important caveats to this general rule: 1 – In nearly all cases, real property located in the United States in not like-kind to property located outside the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:03 am
United States, the court held that contracts for future exchanges should be considered the same as a simultaneous exchange. [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:14 pm by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
Prior Condo Liens Extinguished by Tax Deed A to Z Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:42 am
  Property owners should monitor these efforts as well as similar initiatives by federal and state agencies. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:52 am by Robert Thomas (
First its appraisers, a real estate agent, and one of its members testified that the remainder parcel could not be used for commercial development: it was too far from the highway and MDOT's improvements would block the sight line from the road. [read post]