Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Property"
Results 1 - 20
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
”[9] When the Little Tucker Act was enacted in 1887, and when the statute of limitations was later amended in 1948, a suit “against the United States” was a suit naming the United States as a party in its collective capacity, or one in which the United States was considered an indispensable party to the suit, typically because a judgment against the defendant would obligate public funds, command specific… [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
The Plan included three elementary schools (one already in existence), one middle school, and one high school (previously planned and already under construction). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
TJM also owned certain real property near downtown Dallas, Texas. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
THIS ARTICLE DISCUSSES THE IMPACT OF THAT REVISION as well as considerations for developers contemplating the purchase or development of real property that contains or is likely to contain regulated wetlands. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am
On the one hand, China represents an unprecedented challenge to the United States and other open societies. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
In Congress and in statehouses throughout the United States, lawmakers continue to introduce legislation designed to bar citizens of foreign adversaries from being able to purchase real property. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
Save the El Dorado Ditch v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
” The City can approve TDRs between parcels within the IBC, allowing unused DIV budget allocations to be moved from one site to another without increasing the IBC’s total, overall development intensity budget. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
A principal of zoning since the United State Supreme Court upheld an early zoning ordinance in 1926 (Village of Euclid v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:06 am
The example is lightly modified from the facts in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In 1974, the County adopted a rezoning measure that reduced how many residences Martha could build on its property. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
His interview with one of them was telling. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 8:46 am
Save the El Dorado Ditch v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
In 2010, the real parties applied for a design permit, planned development permit (PDP), tentative map, general plan amendment, and rezoning to build 40 residential units on the parcel. [read post]
