Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Property" Results 81 - 100 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
 A `material fact’ is one that affects the outcome of the suit. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm by Stuart Kaplow
” The stated purpose of the ASTM Standard E1527-21 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment process is “to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am by Guest Author
”[9] When the Little Tucker Act was enacted in 1887, and when the statute of limitations was later amended in 1948, a suit “against the United States” was a suit naming the United States as a party in its collective capacity, or one in which the United States was considered an indispensable party to the suit, typically because a judgment against the defendant would obligate public funds, command specific… [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Schachtman
  The problem, of course, is that how one selects data of past performance to project future performance is part and parcel of the methodology of making the economic projection. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:51 am
How is listing one cross street vs. another ¼ mile away on a 60 acre parcel misleading? [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
An O'Shea, 8 NY3d at p. 3, the Court stated: "Article 18 allowed special assessing units to apply different fractional assessment percentages to each of four classes of property: one-, two- and three-family residential property (class one); all other residential property except hotels and motels and other similar commercial property (class two); utility property (class three); and all other (class four) (see… [read post]