Search for: "United States v. Oregon" Results 1 - 20 of 1,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in Oregon-Idaho Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:01 pm by Jeff Gittins
The United States Court of Federal Claims recently issued its decision in the case of Klamath Irrigation v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 9:14 pm
The blogosphere is filled with rather colorful metaphors and descriptions for what the Oregon Supreme Court was saying to the United States Supreme Court in its recent opinion in Philp Morris v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm by Bill Raftery
We have been taught since grade school (hopefully) that there are “three branches of government” in the United States: the legislative, executive, and judicial. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 1:23 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that in March 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) authorized the states of Oregon, Washington and Idaho to kill up to 85 California sea lions annually at Bonneville Dam. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:19 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Clinton, 2013 WL 121804 (D.Or. 2013), in which the United States District Court for the District of Oregon deemed admissible a midwife's sworn affidavit that she... [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm by Zachary Spilman
CAAF heard oral argument last week in the Article 62 appeal case of United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:34 am
Oregon Taxpayers United, S054403, A122158. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
After the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:56 am by Laura Orr
  It’s a painless way to stay informed about new caselaw:1) 9th Circuit Case Summary Service2) Oregon Court of Appeals Case Summary Service3) Intellectual Property Case Summary Service4) Oregon Supreme Court Case Summary Service5) United States Supreme Court Case Summary ServiceFor example, they alerted me to this upcoming U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm by Austin Mehr
June 21, 2012), the United States District Court for the District of Oregon had occasion to consider whether an insurer’s duty to defend includes an obligation to pay for appellate costs involving non-covered claims." [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 4:02 pm
Anthony Sebok has an article on FindLaw which analyzes the Oregon Supreme Court's recent opinion in Philip Morris v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 10:35 am by Shemia Fagan
Last week, the Oregon Court of Appeals addressed a First Amendment issue that had been untouched by both the United States Supreme Court and the Oregon courts. [read post]