Search for: "United States v. Oregon" Results 221 - 240 of 1,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 10:05 am by Ben Rubin
In a recent decision out of Oregon, a United States District Court found that plaintiffs do not need to prove a likelihood of future take to prevail on a Section 9 claim. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
  The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
Hoppe observes an abrasive attitude by the United States Supreme Court in its recent Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
As Judge McShane of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon wrote in Rummel v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of OregonState v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:41 am by Paul Weiland
In a case with a complicated procedural history, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon recently held (pdf) that a claim for failure to consult under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) arises under the citizen suit provision of that Act rather than under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:51 pm by David Miller
Matt Salmon (R) recently introduced a bill (pdf) that would remove several western states from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and move them to a proposed, to-be-created Twelfth Circuit. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am by Gary L. Francione
On July 7, 2011, the Humane Society of the United States and United Egg Producers announced that they would “work together to seek a federal law that would require larger cages and other improved conditions for the nation’s 280 million laying hens. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
State (Fishing Rights) United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:34 am by Wells Bennett
Pursuant to section 721 of the DPA, CFIUS reviews any transaction “which could result in foreign control of any person engaged in interstate commerce in the United States. [read post]